On 2/23/2013 8:43 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
> After all of your apologizing, I wasn't expecting much. Those are great!
Agreed!
On 2/23/2013 9:23 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
> Thanks, Chris. I had to cull a bunch of shots, but I was pretty happy with
> these two. I really need to look into a
> fast(ish) medium tele - something faster than the 5.6 that I get with the
> 12-50mm. I can't justify the cost of a
> superlens like a 300/2.8, but something between would be nice.
From the focal lengths of those two shots, the $150 Sigma 30/2.8 or the $400
Oly 45/1.8 should do the trick. I gather
the Sigma is quite a bargain, but may not be enough longer than the 20/1.7 to
be worth getting.
The Oly 75/1.8 is supposed to be super, but is a monster, relatively, and $900.
(AND, Oly wants $75 for a hood!)
Then, there's the Panny 35-100mm f/2.8 Lumix G Vario Zoom, even bigger and
heavier - for $1,500.
If you want to manual/zone focus, OM 50/1.4, 85/2 and 100/2.8 come to mind.
Multi Focal Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|