Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot

Subject: Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot
From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:53:26 -0600
Considering where I live, I agree.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ken Norton
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 1:57 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot

> I believe the Turbocommander did not use the more common PT6, which is
> fairly quiet for a turbine, but a solid shaft engine that Cessna used in 
> the
> 441, which killed a lot of sales as it taxied up to a prospective 
> customer.
> Really noisy.

Hot starts were also a problem.

I got to ride in a 441 once. We are running light (I was one of two
passengers) and we had minimal fuel for a couple hour flight. We were
off the ground in very few seconds. As my dad owned a couple of
Cessnas, I'm pretty partial to Cessnas. (Piper evil, Cessna good).

-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz