| Subject: | Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:54:20 -0600 |
> Wow, somebody still flying a 340? That's getting close to classic status > now. Great aircraft for the pilot, not so comfortable for the passengers. Thanks for saying what I was thinking. Might as well haul them around in a Piper Archer. :) I love the labeling for pressurization and radar equipped. That's a nice sell point. The fact is, though, that the 340 really is a nice flying airplane and does pretty well in the usable load vs. fuel category. It's a great 300 mile airplane. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot, Bill Pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot, Bill Pearce |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot, Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Aircraft Shoot, Bill Pearce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |