I am attracted to the 16-35, but can't justify buying one at this time. I just
sprang for the D800 (refurb) and the 70-200/4. I fear I'm going to have to
borrow a wider lens or just make do with the 24.
--Bob
On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:26 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> I had to check but this is the 16-35 I was referring to, mind you your
> 17-35 looks the business as well.
>
> <http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/16-35mm.htm>
>
> If it was me though I would be renting or borrowing the 14-24/2.8
>
>
> On 2/14/13 10:20 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
>> I have the 17-35, and on the D3, it is tops. Don't know about on a D800,
>> probably won't live to have one of those.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|