Trying to eek out one more horse trip (somewhere near Moab I hear
fromt the CVO) with current horse cam but likely will absolutely
require frequent HDR
processing than I am accustomed to due to limited DR. (this could be a
mistake but running out of time) I did some trial runs with PS with 3
raw files hand held and is a bunch of work not have them look "off" and
overdone but results can be fine. The alignment algorithm does seem up
to the job (I hope).
(sheesh my &***&^% phone does hdr afterall)
The lens has a fair amount of barrel distortion at wide end
and I correct most of it via lens correction module in PS but dial back
due to some unwanted effects sometimes in the corners as it is not a
lossless procedure especially for this ye olde cam. If I do that and
leave the 16bit files open after processing in ACR open in PS Iam
warned that I will lose some dynamic range (DR) if I don't use the raw
files. Curiously I did try that and the lens aberrations were clearly
used by PS in merge to HDR even if not run through ACR first (at least
by me)--though can not dial back. I am very confused as to what is best
and how PS knew I wanted to use the lens aberration correction in the
HDR version when just importing the raw files. Is that adjustable too?
OM kit will go too as usual but that will be safe in backpack even if
on horse.
Puzzled, worried Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|