| Subject: | Re: [OM] Since Olympus refused to give us what we wanted somebody else will |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:01:09 -0600 |
> As I already have 9-300 mm (18-600, FF eq.) coverage with native µ4/3 lenses, > not of much practical use for me. Agreed. But there are a few of us still chiseling on stones. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Confession, and a little confusion [was Panny 20mm/1.7 DOF], Wayne Harridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases, Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Since Olympus refused to give us what we wanted somebody else will, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Since Olympus refused to give us what we wanted somebody else will, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |