Deja vu...
On 04/01/2013, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The crop factor (angle of coverage) makes it a 56mm equivalent but the
> real focal length is still 28mm and the real focal ratio is still f/2.
> No f/4 about it.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 1/4/2013 10:09 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>> Gah!
>>
>> Film shots, man, film shots. Who wants to see digital shots from a 56mm
>> f/4.0-equivalent, I want to see what that baby does on your OM-3Ti, as
>> God/Maitani intended it to be - one of the all-time great 28mm f/2.0
>> lenses.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:07 -0600, Ken Norton wrote:
>>>> If it's not a problem, I'd like to see them; I can't find them in the
>>>> usual places
>>>
>>> www.zone-10.com/g2
>>>
>>> It's the 2012-12-31 gallery.
>>>
>>> These are as-is, SOOC, warts and all. Including the blown focus on the
>>> one. Exposures are slightly off, but that's pilot-error.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ken Norton
>>> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.zone-10.com
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|