It's not too bad when the camera is handheld. Some focal lengths are worse
than others too. I was shooting it on the OM-3Ti, OM-4T and DMC-L1
yesterday.
It's safe for Joel to bring his 28/2 out of hiding now.
AG
On Saturday, December 29, 2012, Brian Swale wrote:
> Ken wrote
> >
> > Oh, wow! This 28/2 is almost as good as sax. New instant favorite. Took
> > some low light interior shots. Handheld, with ISO 800 film I was holding
> > decent shutter speeds and the image just popped in the viewfinder. Best
> of
> > all, that distortion level? What distortion? Yeah, I'm pleased.
> >
> > AG-Less Schnozz
>
> Yes, OM Zuiko lenses are good on digital. That stop-down mechanism
> which is the undoing of really sharp images on OM bodies doesn't apply on
> digital. Makes me feel sad that Maitani didn't appreciate the problem
> enough (or at all) on the OMs to fix it.
>
> Brian Swale
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|