That is correct, 2.36M dots.
It is interesting to note that the resolution is 4:3, not 2:3. The real
resolution gain from the E-M5's 800x600 is therefore less then you might
think. But of course, it is also about the optics before the 'screen', and
processing power behind it. On both accounts, I think these newer displays
make big steps. The A99 more then the E-X1, was my impression (I handled
both, but not side to side).
Best, Frank.
Op 1 okt. 2012 02:59 schreef "Chuck Norcutt" het volgende:
>
> I suspect that's the 1024x768. You have to watch the terminology
> they're using these days with respect to EVFs... they say dots, not
> pixels. 1024x768 = 786,432 pixels (if we recognize that a complete pixel
> needs red, green and blue pixels). Multiply 786,432 x 3 gives 2,359,296
> dots.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|