ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:18:07 -0500

> AAARGH, no. No more OM equipment for me. Not again. Been there, done
> that. Must not adopt and repair cool OM orphan camera.

You are a sad, sad man.

;)

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Worth the gamble?, NSURIT Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, NSURIT Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, NSURIT

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Dawid Loubser
Next by Date:	[OM] IMG: Painted Lady and Bee, Jim Nichols
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, Dawid Loubser
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Worth the gamble?, NSURIT
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]