Or even that, around the time of the Caledonian Orogeny, you and I would
have been near neighbours. Trouble is, I don't know whether you would have
been here, or I there, never mind where either of those points might have
been located. In the greater scheme of things, it's neither here nor there!
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Whitmire [mailto:bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 July 2012 01:18
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] off course
Speaking of drift, weren't we talking about climate change the other day?
How come no one ever mentions continental drift when they talk about climate
change. It's gotta be a huge contributor, right? I mean, look at the
Hawaiian Islands. Or Antarctica. Or the Indian subcontinent and the fact
that the summit of Mt. Everest is marine limestone. Subject drift is a piker
compared with continental drift.
--Bob
On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I wondered what life would be like with an OM-D.
>
> I bought a pair of near-field reference monitors.
>
> Oops. There goes the subject drift again...
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|