A few years ago we played with various graphic cards at work and found
to our surprise that often the basic ones looked better.
On 6/30/12 7:15 AM, Jez Cunningham wrote:
> So you would say that for regular (still) photo editing there is no need
> for a fancy graphics card, and the embedded video capabilities of the
> motherboard are sufficient? That's very interesting.
> I had always assumed (and the probably ill-informed salespeople were happy
> to confirm) that if 'I want to use it for Photo editing' ---> 'Well Sir,
> you'll need this fancy graphics card'.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|