Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?

Subject: Re: [OM] Seriously, who needs a Noctilux?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:06:54 -0700
On 4/10/2012 1:30 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> ...  Well, it's a 50/1.2! Not many other ways to get this shallow DOF and 
> angle of view. 

"Yeah, that part's a little rough looking, but it's the cheap brushes that 
cheat sold me! But it's all I could find 
where I was, to capture this scene, and the light. And that wrinkle? I tell 
you, it's impossible to get good help to 
stretch canvas nowadays!" Tintoretto

> ...
>>> Neighborgoods Market Alley
>>> http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/100/a/c/neighborgoods_market_alley_by_philosomatographer-d4vppa0.jpg
>> Is that guy carrying a film camera!? Something odd going on around
>> his head and arm.
> It's called blurring because of insane shallow DOF

Not buying that one.

> , and some off-axis aberration (he's right on the frame edge).

Yeah, could be.

But to the viewer, possible buyer, the tools matter not a whit. It's what the 
image looks like. They may be happy with a 
crappie snappies of family, but look at art differently.

If the 50/1.2 were your daughter, I'd have nothing but praise for her art. :-)

Rough Edged Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz