Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars

Subject: Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars
From: "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:25:16 +0000
Pretty rampant speculation there.  Fuji's got plenty of resources, and
builds their own lenses for tons of other applications, so why not build
them for still image cameras?  Last time I checked Fuji is still making
their own large format lenses as well...


On 4/6/12 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Honestly, I doubt that Fuji has been building their own higher-end
> lenses/bodies for many years. The camera and lens division was always
> so small that it only takes the retirement of a small handful of
> people for them to lose the ability to produce. This happened to Nikon
> with the FM3A. They actually had to bring people out of retirement to
> build it. That skillset is now completely gone.
> 
> If a company is constantly building complex camera designs, it makes
> sense to keep the design, tooling and manufacturing in-house. But just
> looking at Fuji, they haven't done anything like this in years, so the
> liklihood of outsourcing is almost certain. And when it comes to
> outsourcing a camera like this, there is only one company that can do
> it.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz