> So, how many of your images are you going to be presenting at pixel level?
That's pretty much the heart of the question. Here are several points to ponder:
1. 100% pixels on the E-1 is about equivalent to Chuck's 33% rule with
a 16MP sensor. The 33% rule is for OUTPUT considerations, though, not
componant testing.
2. If presented at 800 pixel width on the web, the differences between
the lenses is almost insignificant. There are some differences, but
you really don't learn about them until you zoom in.
3. Do I present A-B comparison crops? Or do I just show the sample
images one ofter another on the Gary Reese Lens Test pages for each
lens? 100% crop or full-frame? And if full-frame, what width?
4. The application-centric selection. Do I just show the images that
represent a typical photograph of flowers with wide to moderate
apertures to exploit bokeh as much as possible? If so, which ranges?
5. Do I show the apertures which are exclusive to the more expensive lenses?
6. If a woodchuck could chuck wood, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck?
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|