Damn - just realised - I got confused here with the Kodachromes.
Need coffee.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
On 16/03/2012, at 8:51 AM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> I suspect that the whole style is to be looking away from the camera to the
> task in hand. Not a favoured style now for environmental portraits and a
> catch light is moot. Check 5 and 18 where the subject is engaged with the
> camera. I was more bothered by they're letting the women dress up for the
> shoot - very obvious and unrealistic. They're just too clean and pretty.
> And I preferred 17 - that grungy look is much favoured by printers now but
> they don't do it nearly as well.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.soultheft.com
>
>
>
> On 16/03/2012, at 4:41 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> 418.
>>
>> Great as always. It's just a bummer that it's a year between installments.
>>
>> One thing that is bothering me a little with this year's selections is the
>> lack of light in the eyes. Even the tiniest bit of fill light with a flash
>> set on minimum would have openned them up more. But I'm really picking nits
>> here.
>>
>> AG
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|