It could use some shrinking. Then maybe the rest of us can catch up.
Joel W.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012, at 04:58 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Yes, the brain has shrunk too. But I think its color comprehension is
> still OK. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/7/2012 11:57 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > Brains then.
> >
> > Joel W.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> >> I just realized that I don't have to wait until I get back home to
> >> compare images processed using the old monitor against viewing on the
> >> new one. I only need to compare what was processed in the month of
> >> December on the new monitor with what I see today on the old monitor.
> >>
> >> I, of course, can't do a direct comparison since both monitors are not
> >> in the same place. But, after checking a few images done last December
> >> against what I see now on the old monitor I'm perfectly happy with the
> >> way they look. If the old monitor's color is off it's not by much. But
> >> the horizontal size has definitely shrunk a bit.
> >>
> >> Chuck Norcutt
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/7/2012 9:18 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> >>> I'm guessing monitor. But then it could be my monitor, though it
> >>> profiles well, it pretty new, and seems close to other reference points
> >>> in most respects.
> >>>
> >>> That's the problem with the web. We have no account of what other
> >>> people actually see. Furthermore, I am slightly disturbed by variances
> >>> in programs and their rendering of color saturation. For example, I am
> >>> now using Sagelight fairly consistently because I like some of its tools
> >>> very much. However, its rendering of the image color is slightly
> >>> different from PS once I pull the image into PS for some final
> >>> processes. But how much of that is illusion? Sagelight does everything
> >>> it can to maximize the image on the screen, and its background is black.
> >>> PS uses top and bottom real estate so that the image is smaller, and
> >>> the background is gray. Nevertheless, even when I minimize the effect
> >>> of these variances there seems to be a slight saturation loss in PS
> >>> compared to what I might have had looking about the way I wanted in
> >>> Sagelight.
> >>>
> >>> Then sometimes I'll come back to something I had been working on
> >>> previously and wonder "Who killed a rabbit on my photo?"
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it *is* brains.
> >>>
> >>> Joel W.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012, at 07:49 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> >>>> Aging eyes, brain or monitor. Could be any of them or all. When I last
> >>>> profiled this monitor a few weeks ago the software complained about
> >>>> inability to achieve a proper black level. Also, the horizontal size
> >>>> has shrunk about 5% since then. The vertical size as well but not so
> >>>> much. No color effects from that but it does indicate the electronics
> >>>> are aging and changing values.
> >>>>
> >>>> It will be interesting to view the images I've processed on this old
> >>>> monitor here in Florida when I get back to my new Dell IPS panel when I
> >>>> get back home.
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|