Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-D specs!

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D specs!
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:42:15 -0600
>     Perhaps Ken got a manual with his review sample?

Hahahahahaha!!!

After I shredded Olympus over the past two years you think that I got my
invitation to the unveiling? Or a review sample?

There was something very interesting in the Terada interviews. He made an
oblique mention to the skewering Olympus got over the E-Pens design and the
fact the cameras lacked serious features. Also, in another interview, he
let it be known that the Four-Thirds system is now undead again. (Like that
promised 100mm macro will ever happen).

Just maybe my one voice of dissent combined with a few others may have
caused them to realize that the customers--they weren't happy. In tracking
domain-name visitors, I know that every one of my Olympus articles has been
accessed by multiple people from Olympus Japan. I'm not taking credit, but
I did take a stand. To the point where I'm sure it severely affected a
friendship with Khen. But I cannot sit idly by and watch a company I like
so much go and pull a Kodak.

As much as I've ripped Olympus apart for their product management and
marketing, I believe in fairness. When they do something right, I will
praise them like a company shill, singing the company song and saluting the
company flag while wearing the blue and white company smocks. Sorry, no
tattoos. But a piercing may be OK.

Left ear, right ear or both?

My review sample will be purchased.

AG (less cynical today) Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz