Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM) Olympus Corp woes

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM) Olympus Corp woes
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:37:59 -0500
Think of your new granddaughter instead of torturing yourself over the 
use/misuse of mere words... which you would be powerless to change even 
if you were the director of the English Language Police.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


On 12/13/2011 7:18 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> What on earth does the "literally" mean?  What part does it play in that 
> sentence?
>
> That word was so useful before ignoramuses started using it for emphasis, 
> ignoring its meaning.
>
> Chris (grumpy)
> :-)
>
> On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:28, Piers Hemy wrote:
>
>> Olympus had originally been a sound company, with diligent employees and
>> high technical strength. Not all part of the company was involved in this
>> misconduct. Olympus should remove its malignant tumor and literally renew
>> itself.
>> END
>>
>> In light of those words, it is no surprise that most of the board will now
>> go (which I think is the current state of play). And I assume that Mr
>> Woodford is now working diligently with some major shareholders to lead a
>> new team - because "they" the shareholders will be appointing the successor
>> board.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz