Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Neat image Q?

from Moose

Subject:	Re: [OM] Neat image Q?
From:	Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:15:17 -0700

On 8/8/2011 5:05 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Ayuh. Should have said that. But that wouldn't reinforce my truth-based 
> prejudice, would it?<g>

Nicely obfuscated.

Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Neat image Q?, (continued) [OM] Neat image Q?, usher99 Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Moose Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Chuck Norcutt [OM] For the global warming disucssion, sctroy Re: [OM] For the global warming disucssion, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] For the global warming disucssion, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] For the global warming disucssion, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] For the global warming disucssion, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Moose <= Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Bob Whitmire [OM] Neat image Q?, usher99 Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Moose Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Neat image Q?, usher99

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OM) Totally OT - Climate Change (Andrew Fildes), Moose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] (OM) OT Programs stealing bandwidth, Jez Cunningham
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Bob Whitmire
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Neat image Q?, Bob Whitmire
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]