Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh

Subject: Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh
From: "Jeff Keller" <om-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:38:12 -0700
Could it be that your OM-1n wasn't adapted to silver oxide batteries, just 
tweaked enough that non-mercury batteries didn't completely destroy the 
exposure?

Jeff Keller

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile [mailto:fgonzalezgentile@xxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [OM] a flower?, or Zuiko 300mm 4,5 bokeh

Thanks, guys :-) - it could have been better, Ken.
I made 2 more shots, at f/5,6 and f/8.
They showed better exposed, which lead me to think this _LNIB_ black
OM 1n, is not exposing quite exactly at 1/250, and therefore neither
on 1/500 nor on 1/1000.

The meter is accurate, the SS might not be.
Sending it to John is not a problem, but getting it back through
Customs may be so.

Need more evidence, nonetheless - but I suspect I'm right :-(

How frequently is this inaccuracy observed / show up?

Thanks for looking :-)

Fernando.




-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz