Thank you, Ken. That's what I remember you said about your experience
... searched Zone 10 in the meanwhile, trying to find an exposure of
yours, and found it.
So ... I correctly placed my order - after a minute of doubt if I
remembered well what previously discussed (maybe more than 2 years ago
... )
This film (Velvia 100) was never available here ... sort of snob
shooting Velvia 100 in Montevideo :-)
Somehow surprised about what you say 'bout the resolving power of
Provia 100F ... I'm right now scanning Provia, watching the results in
my new monitor ... and wow.
Yes I'm aware of Ektar 100, but I'll leave C41 for ISO 400 and higher.
I like to take the frames out of the box and watch them in positive,
at first sight.
Thanks again.
:-)
Fernando.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I personally like Velvia 100 over 100F and Velvia 50. However, 100F
> has just a little more shadow detail and scans a little cleaner.
> Otherwise, I prefer the tonalities (bold, in your face) of 100 the
> best.
>
> 100F has the same problem that Provia 100F has. It doesn't resolve as
> much as Velvia 50 or 100. Some believe that Velvia 100 outresolves 50
> and I don't dispute that at all.
>
> Otherwise, if you want to have a C41 alternative, I'm really liking
> Kodak Ektar 100.
>
> AG
> --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|