> But of course, nothing matches Olympus's software for clunkiness, in my view.
I disagree. But I am a Studio user. There is a difference between
Studio and Viewer in how it allows you to batch process as well as
apply settings and tweeks to groups of images. The sort/compare screen
is also very good. On my machine it is also about 4X faster than
Lightroom. As brilliant as Lightroom is, it is also one of the
clunkiest programs ever written. Simply bizaar on so many levels.
Alas, it has no generic RAW converter, so it is Olympus-centric. My
cameras speak multiple languages, so that is a major showstopper
unless I'm hanging loose with JPEGs.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|