I don't think you could go wrong with either, but I have to concede
there is an aesthetic to the E-P2 (and, initially, the E-P1) that has
always appealed (though I think the E-PL2 approaches it as well). If
your mind is not driven by that kind of aesthetic love of objects for
this particular purchase, I'd go for the "better" camera, whichever it
is. I hope this ambiguous opinion has helped. ;)
Cheers,
Marc
On 1 April 2011 18:20, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing those marc, but drat just as I had decided that the
> e-pl2 is the better choice because of the crappy lens and sensor on the
> e-p2 ;-) you show me that its not the case. The p-2 is definately the
> nicer looking camera and the two dials appeal.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|