Thanks again for your comment, I'm really appericated. I'm very interested
to know how other people feel about an image (no matter it is mine or not),
that is how we learnt and improve. I have no objection to your comment on
the donuts, it is certainly a "problem" (busy background) of mirror lens but
I just want to share what I think, sometimes a flat background could be a
little boring.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I really should have been more effusive in my praise of these shots
> since the donut comment takes too much precedence. They're not simply
> just "nice" but rather excellent.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/1/2011 11:22 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Thanks for looking and the kind comment, Chuck. I post 1465 because I
>> found
>> the background rather interesting, with donuts but soft and pleasing
>> (like a
>> wallpaper behind), not the usual type found on some traditional mirror
>> lens
>> images.
>>
>> One of the purpose of using mirror lens is making use of special
>> background
>> effects, I'm not always object to the donuts. 1358 is another type,
>> although
>> busy but also gives a cheerful look especially with the hot red color.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>> Very nice overall. But there are some (not very obtrusive) donuts
>>> visible in 1465.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|