| Subject: | Re: [OM] Seeking comments on E-30 vs. E-620 |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:12:01 -0600 |
Basing the decision on battery compatibility is a very valid reason. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-510 heat was RE: Back from Enduro India - OM 35-80/2.8 paid the priceandis stuck on F8, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Images from India 2011, SwissPace |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Seeking comments on E-30 vs. E-620, GMcGrath |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Seeking comments on E-30 vs. E-620, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |