Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM Macro 50 f2 vs 50 f3.5

Subject: Re: [OM] OM Macro 50 f2 vs 50 f3.5
From: Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:29:09 -0500
No, the f2 is only 1:2 just like the f3.5. I don't think there are different
versions, it wasn't made long, unlike the f3.5.

I have actually never made a macro photo with mine but it is an incredible
normal lens! The sharpness is astounding.I took a photo of my son several
years ago from about 20 feet away and you could count the stitches on his
jeans in a large print!


-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-486-2581

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook



On 1/14/11 9:48 PM, "AS" <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Comparing the 50mm f2 and f3.5. Is the f2 a 1:1 lens? Are there different
> variations of f2? 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz