No one would ever credit a 172 with lots of power.
From: Walters, Martin [mailto:Martin.Walters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:15 AM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] OT: A great day back at work
As Chris flies jet fighters, I suspect that he wouldn't apply the
descriptor "all that power" to most propeller-driven planes (perhaps
with honourable exceptions such as Spitfires, Mustangs and the like).
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Barker [mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 11:05 AM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] OT: A great day back at work
:-)
On 6 Jan 2011, at 14:49, Bill Pearce wrote:
> Ibelieve Cessna certified an aerobatic version of the 172. must have
> been great with all that power.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3363 - Release Date: 01/06/11
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|