Agreed, Chris. The 172 would seem to be an unlikely candidate, except
the idea is to create a powerplant replacement for an existing
airframe that can take it. This is actually rather smart as those
things are essentially disposable. I'm more likely to think they will
succeed by focussing on just the powerplant than try to compete
against the entire industry with a soup to nuts airframe that will
take decades to bring to market.
AG
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|