Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 0.95

Subject: Re: [OM] 0.95
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:35:23 -0500
Depth of field is a print or output characteristic.  The greater the 
enlargement the less the depth of field.  The depth of field is reduced 
in a cropped image by virtue of needing greater enlargement.  It is 
also, of course, influenced by viewing distance.  The shorter the 
viewing distance the less the depth of field.  It all boils down to 
whether the enlargement is big enough or the viewing distance close 
enough to be able to see something as small as the CoC.  And the desired 
CoC is itself a variable based upon viewing distance, enlargement and 
the assumed resolution of the human eye (at a given light frequency of 
course).

And we haven't even begun to discuss focal length and aperture yet.  No 
wonder folks gets confused.  Then you've got folks who bop in and say, 
wait a minute!  That's all based on thin lens theory which is just a 
simplificaction.  The *real* story is... too complicated to tell.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


On 11/19/2010 3:43 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Yes I was bothered by this. I mean, how does mere cropping or masking
> change the DOF? Doesn't make sense to me. Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 20/11/2010, at 7:26 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> BP writes:
>>
>> "Let's remember, before this gets too clouded. A 50 mm lens has
>> the same dof as a 100mm lens, if the 50 is cropped to the same
>> coverage area as the 100."
>>
>> Well almost but not quite.  Even with the thin lens assumption the
>> FL term for near and far limits of dof do not fall out.  The
>> distribution of the dof changes with a higher percentage of the dof
>> distal to the plane of focus with shorter FL's.   Not really much
>> shift at the 50 and 100mm choices but pick something wider and
>> there will be a larger difference.  Dr. Focus concurred with this
>> from a post a year or two ago.
>>
>> Would be thrilled to see a full wave dof calculator for even one
>> complex lens--perhaps ping Zeiss.
>>
>> Skeptical about  thin assumptions, Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz