Bob ..... my apologies for your name typo.
Between you and Andrew Fildes and I now feel more informed about art and
commercial activity. Thanks.
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Whitmire" <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2010: cute Danish couple
> Short answer:
>
> It's lawyer talk, which is not necessarily rational. Yes, what I do is
> "commercial" in that I exchange goods for money, but in the art world,
> exchanging "art" prints for money, legally speaking, is not legally a
> commercial activity, while selling photos to companies to use in
> advertising and promotion is.
>
> Don't try to make it make sense. It won't. <g>
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> www.bobwhitmire.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2010, at 6:45 AM, John Hudson wrote:
>
>> I wonder what Bob Whitmore thinks. He is selling his images on line and
>> over
>> the counter and I'm sure that they can be classified as works of art or
>> "artwork".
>>
>> Is he not engaged in a commercial activity ?
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|