I disagree, what you are describing is built-in synchronised panning to cope
with subject movement. I am talking about sensor movement relative to the
image.
Get (side)real!
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Nichols [mailto:ian.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 28 October 2010 15:43
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Think you've got image data storage problems?
On 28 October 2010 13:54, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not impressed - it might be full frame, but it doesn't have IS,
Eh? of course it has IS, but instead of just moving the sensor, it moves
the whole telescope. One complete turn per sidereal day.
--
Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
prove you wrong. Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is no
aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
-Daria Morgendorffer
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|