| Subject: | Re: [OM] GH2 specs |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:53:06 -0500 |
Film does have its place. If your are going after perfection in the images, stay far away. But film does present a different result in the images which can be exploited. That said, I'm heading off for a long hike with a camera. Hmm. scattered rain showers and a bad back. Which camera and lens to take? I'm thinking OM-3ti with 50/1.4. ag -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] No on caught my stupid error, was: GH2 specs! wow!!!, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] No on caught my stupid error, was: GH2 specs! wow!!!, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] GH2 specs, David Irisarri |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] GH2 specs, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |