| Subject: | Re: [OM] Two versions of 24/2? |
|---|---|
| From: | Ralf Loi <ralf_loi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:31:43 +0200 |
It seems to me that the changes are mainly mechanical. Also the changed lenses seems to differ only for the mechanical coupling to the metal elements on the edges, but without an optical test we will never known. Ralf -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Film ain't dead, yet, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Reason to travel, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Two versions of 24/2?, Dawid Loubser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Two versions of 24/2?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |