Yes, my question too. Since the light is presumably a candle that we
can't see near the top of the photo the effect of the inverse square law
must be quite dramatic over such short distances. So, yes, where was
the meter?
Chuck Norcutt
Tom Fenwick wrote:
> On 12 May 2010 09:37, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>> An incident light meter simply cannot be equalled by any other in-
>> camera reflected-light
>> metering solution, no matter what it does. This is in terms of
>> "accuracy"....
>
> <snip>
>
>> http://snipurl.com/w5ux5
>
>
> <snip>
>
>> ... no additional brain-power required.
>>
>
> Where did you hold your incident meter?
>
> Tom
>
>> Dawid
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|