Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Oly 9-18 vs Panasonic 7-14: any experience out there?

Subject: Re: [OM] Oly 9-18 vs Panasonic 7-14: any experience out there?
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 07:56:13 +0200
Thanks Iwert. The filter issue is a non-issue for me, as I never use filters 
anyway. I do find the 9-18 range more useful than 7-14 but optical quality is 
more important.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog






On May 9, 2010, at 9:08 PM, zuiko wrote:

> Hello Nathan,
> 
> since you have a Panasonic body, I'ld go for the 7-14. The only
> disadvantage is that it does not use filters.
> It is faster and only a bit bigger (the 9-18 uncollapsed is probably
> about the same size), and apparently well corrected on Panasonic. I'm
> underwhelmed by the optical quality of the M.Zuiko's to say the least
> (from what I see in the tests).
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Iwert
> 
> 2010/5/9 Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> During my trip to US later this month, I plan to take advantage of exchange 
>> rates and relative prices and get a wide angle zoom for my Panasonic GF-1. 
>> When the new 9-18mm from Olympus was announced, I got pretty excited about 
>> it, as its focal range is exactly what I need, and the light weight and 
>> compactness are very much in keeping with the whole Micro 4/3 credo.
>> 
>> However, reading the review of the lens on dpreview, I get a distinct 
>> impression that the 9-18 is dog's breakfast: unsharp in corners (improves 
>> when stopping down, but so does every lens), high chromatic aberration, 
>> flare--in other words, a high price to pay for small size. The Panasonic 
>> 7-14mm seems more solid and better performing.
>> 
>> So now I am leaning towards the 7-14. But before placing the order, I would 
>> like to hear any personal experiences with these 2 lenses, in Micro 4/3 
>> mount (the 9-18 is available in regular 4/3 where it is apparently a lot 
>> better optically). The $300 price difference is of no consequence.
>> 
>> TIA,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> 
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz