| Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0) |
|---|---|
| From: | Paul Cox <tastydoublecapp@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 May 2010 10:31:13 -0500 |
While I currently prefer film to digital, I think digital deserves a better place than Bud Lite. I can get a fair amount of enjoyment out of digital photography, Bud anything is another matter. That stuff ought not to be allowed to be called beer. The Guinness bit I complete agree with. Paul C <snip>digital is like "Bud Lite"</snip> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Flash foul-up, what happened?, Charles Geilfuss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] I need new glasses - please - what is the best lens material these days?, Charles Geilfuss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0), Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM lens size vs Leica M (e.g. 21mm f/2.0), Paul Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |