| Subject: | Re: [OM] So this is what it means.... PanaLeica redux version 1 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:40:29 +1200 |
Ken wrote; > It is obvious to me, in > looking at the images that the 14-54's resolution far exceeds the ability > of the sensor to capture. The edge-detail is simply incredible. But in light of what else he wrote, I wonder if he meant to refer to the PanaLeica 14-50 in the above sentence? Brian Swale. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Bokeh Guitar, Ralf Loi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, Carlos J. Santisteban |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] So this is what it means.... PanaLeica redux version 1, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] So this is what it means.... PanaLeica redux version 1, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |