Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35/2: poor performer and other myths

Subject: Re: [OM] 35/2: poor performer and other myths
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:58:45 +0800
OM 35/2 is a very fine lens, here is an example I posted last year, 5D II,
sharpness=1, F5.6:

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_5761.JPG

OM 55/1.2 is a very sharp lens, I like it more than the 50/1.2 I had,
unfortunately my 55/1.2 created warm tone images due to yellowish elements.
I sold it at the film age as color correction was no fun, if I have keep it
until now I will not sell it as color correction is much easier with
digital.

C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nicholas Herndon"

> For a long time I avoided the OMZ 35/2 because of what I read on
> various message boards and websites.  But when looking for examples
> online, I found surprisingly little in the way of real world images
> taken with this lens.  I like 35mm as a focal length, and while I was
> not very fond of the 35/2.8, I was keen on getting a 35mm lens for my
> OM after getting rid of my 35/2.8.  So I decided to take a chance on a
> 35/2 that John H had for sale on his site.  Prices on the OMZ 35/2
> have been ridiculously low as of late, so I figured now was the time
> to buy.
> I have not been disappointed.  It is a sharp lens, with good contrast,
> and useable wide open.  It would make a good combo with the 100/2 or
> 135/2.8.  My only complaint is that the bokeh can be a bit busy
> sometimes, but it's not terrible.
> And speaking of useable wide open, my recently acquired OMZ 55/1.2 is
> eminently useable wide open.  In fact, I prefer using it wide open for
> the look that it gives.  It can be somewhat unpredictable in its
> rendering, and focus is critical with such a thin DoF, but after just
> a few short weeks it is toward the top of my list of favorite Zuikos.
> I don't know that I would call it sharp wide open, but it is sharp
> enough, with good contrast and really nice bokeh.  In fact, because of
> this lens, I have started using a lot more of my lenses wide open.
> Why pay for speed if you're not going to use it?
>
>
> Anyone else have any experiences that fly in the face of conventional
> photography wisdom?

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz