Thanks for the praise, Nicholas. OM 180/2.8 is not much bigger than the
200/4, it is even 3mm shorter. At 700g it does not feel big on the 5D II but
on the OM body you need a MD or Winder for better balance. Actually, I
prefer to use it on my OM-4 with MD-1, OM with MD hold MUCH better than the
5D II.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicholas Herndon" <nherndon@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Here again is the yearly portrait event in the HK flower show,
>> all shots with OM180/2.8 at F2.8 on a 5D II body at ISO160.
>
> CH, wonderful portraits. The 180/2.8 is such a nice lens, but it
> looks pretty big, especially compared to the 200/4. How do you feel
> it handles on an OM body, and do you prefer it on the 5DII?
> --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|