Mike, it's very possible that the f/2.8 version actually has better
performance at optimum aperture than the f/2.0 version, and it certainly
has a bit less barrel distortion.
On 02 Mar 2010, at 3:17 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> It's ***tiny***slower brother is no slouch either. AFAIK, 16-9 did
> not include the F2 in the play-offs as it was not tested.
> The floating element should provide for better close performance.
> I'll defer to Dawid on the F2 but I am not giving up my Z. 24 f2.8.
>
> http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/24mmcup/final/24mm_final1.html
>
> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|