ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!

Subject:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:31:31 -0600

>
> Never been to Kansas, have you Nathan?
>

Good thing the lenses are flat-fielded.

AG (badabing) Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, (continued) Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Bob Docherty Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, Chuck Norcutt

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]