Hi Andrew and all,
On 17/11/2009, at 11:16 PM, I wrote:
> But maybe I'm wrong. Anyone has a picture of what _should_ be lens
> separation?
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
><http://static.photo.net/attachments/bboard/00J/00JWi6-34438484.jpg>
Thanks! Just what I thought.
Here's one of my (OT) lenses, severely affected by separation: <
http://cjss.sytes.net/etc/coleccion/nikkor35f2.jpeg>
...although it doesn't impair optical performance -- checked against a mint
unit of the same lens!
Cheers,
--
Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas
IES Turaniana (Roquetas de Mar, Almeria)
<http://cjss.sytes.net/>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
