Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Adventures in raw processing WAS: Who in the world, writes thi

Subject: Re: [OM] Adventures in raw processing WAS: Who in the world, writes this junk?
From: Jim Couch <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:22:52 -0800
Joel,
I actually disabled pretty much all the other settings in Studio, so as 
to just compare the WB across the various softwares. I also changed the 
WB from 'As Shot' (camera was set on Auto WB) to Daylight. I am sure 
that accounts for the differences you are seeing, even with those 
changes the two are very similar.

Jim Couch

Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> Jim,
> The jpg and Studio are a pretty good match, but I'm surprised they are
> not a perfect match if you didn't change any of the camera settings
> either in the camera or in conversion.  Maybe it's a 620 vagary.
>
> OK I'll go out on a limb.
>
> This set demonstrates one of the things that I have noted about the
> non-Olympus converters and Studio.  I'm really sensitive to the color
> of the sky.  Studio is better here (and quite other) than all the
> other converters to my eyes.  But I'm puzzled why it doesn't match the
> jpg a little better than it does, and I actually prefer it to the jpg.
>
> Joel W.
>   
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz