It looks like you're going to have to buy one and post some samples so
we can see what it does. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Well, not many questions, just one - I just wanted to see what the
> members owning one has been up to with it, .i.e. to see some sample
> images :-) But Fernando, you should know that this list goes through
> different micro-phases all the time. I have seen the 350/2.8 being
> discussed a lot in the past also, by looking at the list archives.
>
> Also, the 250/2.0 has the ultra-coolness-factor, since it's optically
> the best Zuiko ever made, and it's an f/2, and there were apparently
> very, very few made. Of the 350/2.8, there were only "few made" :-)
> Kind of an "ultimate" lens, and just that little bit more special/
> exotic to most people, since there is in today's modern lens lineups
> absolutely no equivalent, even though there are plenty 300/2.8 and
> 400/2.8 lenses.
>
> But really, I was just wanting to see some samples, have still only
> seen a small handful. And no Black+White film samples :-(
>
>> Because David Loubser started raising lots of questions about the
>> 250/2
>> about 10 days ago. No one ventured the same level of interest in the
>> 350/2.8. I didn't even know there was such a lens.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>>> Why does the list comment so much related to the 250/2, and not so
>>> much on the 350/2.8?
>>>
>>> Just curious ...
>>>
>>> Fernando.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|