I was complaining about my own lack of translation from "here's high
ISO" to "here's what we can do with it". The problem wasn't recognizing
that what used to be done at f/2 could now be shot at f/5.6 but rather
that what was previously impossible might now be able to be shot at f/2.
You have to at least go measure to find out what's possible. I wasn't
measuring but just assuming. And we all know about assumptions, eh? :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Tom Fenwick wrote:
> Well now I'm glad I bought a 620 for my dad's 70th the other week, otherwise
> I'd be feeling exposed too.
>
> Personally I'm happy enough with my 5D2s but everybody's different.
>
> And I'm not sure what's so hard to understand about the use of high iso. If
> I used to be able to shoot at f2 in some situation, and now I get to choose
> to stop down to f5.6 if I want, shouldn't I be happy?
>
> Perhaps I'm just too brainless to understand.
>
> Tom
>
> 2009/10/21 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>> And which brainless twit's wedding photography are you criticizing here?
>>>
>> Present company excluded. Brainless twits don't buy Olympus.
>>
>> AG
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|