I like the feeling of a wave looming in a couple of those shots, Moose.
I agree with you about the software that comes with a Canon. I like
the look of it better than that of Olympus, but it works well also.
I was at a busy waterfall over our holiday last month. The Falls of
Dochart, near Killin in Perthshire, Scotland, are a lovely, noisy
affair. I know that one or two of the List don't like creamy water,
but I managed quite a few handheld shots with my E-3/12-60 combination
at pretty low speeds:
http://gallery.me.com/zuiko#100085/_9043143&bgcolor=black
Any ideas why not, Ian W?
And Moose, feel free to indicate what needs to happen to improve that
shot, if you have the time and inclination ...
Chris
For some reason, the Aperture exports don't show the EXIF when you
click on the "i"
On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:25, Moose wrote:
>
> Yes. And yet ... The 300D has worked very well with ACR from the
> beginning. I have many favorite images from it. As is so often the
> case,
> time, place, subject and light are unique and I can't "top" them with
> the 5D later, even in the same place. For example, we returned to
> Steep
> Falls this trip. The flow and light were different. I got some nice
> images, but they will add something different to some of the previous
> 300D images, rather than replacing them.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/SteepFalls/>
>
> I've never much liked Canon's RAW converter, DPP, but that may be at
> least in part because I have hardly used it, so don't know it. In
> Canon's favor, the software that comes with their camera is extensive,
> stable, well written in the technical sense, and includs things like
> an
> app for tethered operation and endless upgrades are free.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|