I love 002.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Those look mighty fine to me.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Even with RAW one can still have some images need no special adjustment
>> except simple +/- compensation, I consider these are direct outputs, for
>> example:
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D002.html
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D010.html
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D013.html
>>
>> But in many cases additional adjustment is required for my taste.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure all the Canyon users here shoot raw. I'd be hard
>>> pressed to tell you what the direct output from Canyon (a JPEG utilizing
>>> some set of processing parameters) looks like. I couldn't tell you if
>>> it was good or bad.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>>
>>> Ken Norton wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for watching, Phx. I'm not a fancy guy but sometimes just can't
>>>>> stand
>>>>> the direct output from Canyon :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Whenever I've said something like that, the bricks fall down on me.
>>>>
>>>> Now I just ignore it altogether. It is obvious that just like MP3 audio
>>>> files being accepted as "great", the dumbing down of the masses has
>>>> occurred
>>>> and the Canyon "look" is accepted as "great".
>>>>
>>>> Whatever...
>>>>
>>>> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|