ML Archive: Re: [OM] one for walt

Subject:	Re: [OM] one for walt
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:47:41 -0500

I thought it was illegal to have guns in England anymore.

What gives?

Or was that law just for the common folks?

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] one for walt, (continued) Re: [OM] one for walt, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] one for walt, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] one for walt, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] one for walt, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] one for walt, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] one for walt, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] one for walt, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] one for walt, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] one for walt, John Hermanson Re: [OM] one for walt, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Barker Re: [OM] one for walt, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] one for walt, Philippe Amard Re: [OM] one for walt, Rick Beckrich Re: [OM] one for walt, Donald Re: [OM] one for walt, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] one for walt, John Hermanson Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] one for walt, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Crawford

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OM) once again, digital vs film, Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Barker
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] one for walt, John Hermanson
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] one for walt, Chris Barker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] one for walt