| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-3Ti |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:58:02 +1000 |
How quaint - despite all evidence to the contrary? Entropy is not equilibrium. Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 27/09/2009, at 10:49 PM, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote: > One might think there is an imaginary balance of gains and > losses .... > > ;-) > > You will get no argument from me that there is both a flow and a > balance in > the Universe. Bill Barber -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OM) once again, digital vs film, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, NSURIT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |